On May 23, 2018, we published revised versions of our Privacy Policy and User Agreements. Please read these updated terms and take some time to understand them. Your use of our services is subject to these revised terms.
Yes, I Agree.

Falcon Crest Energy (FCEN) Shallow Targets & Promise of Conventional Oil Production in Powder River Basin Extremely Attractive Amid Price Slump

Development-stage oil and gas E&P, Falcon Crest Energy, successfully bought up the last of the Rocky Ford Oil Field (Crook County) working interest in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin (PRB) last month and thereby achieved a 100% WI in the 584.78-acre oil patch on the eastern edge of the PRB. Crook County is right up there when it comes to oil production in the state, with 102k bbls in November 2014 according to DrillingEdge, alongside counties like Fremont County, where some of the state’s top producing wells are and where over 312k bbls of oil were pumped out in the same month last year. Several of the state’s top oil producers, like Anadarko (NYSE: APC) 709k bbls in November, EOG Resources (NYSE: EOG) 587k bbls and Marathon Oil (NYSE: MRO) 590k bbls, continue to be bullish about their ability to unlock the vast oil and gas reserves within the PRB, despite WTI hovering somewhere under the $48 mark as of late March 2015.

Despite declining rig counts due to the slump in oil prices, the PRB continues to be one of the most attractive domestic plays and saw 78k bbls/day production numbers last year (EIA), having produced 19% more oil for the year than in 2013, with some 75 million barrels in all. Roughly the same amount of gas (around 2 trillion cubic feet) was produced last year in the state as in 2013 and exit data for the month of November 2014 showed roughly 6.4 million bbls of oil and 161 million MCF of gas were produced from over 32.3k currently-producing wells during the month. The underexploited acreage FCEN is exploring to the east of Moorcroft, on the eastern edge of the PRB, is particularly attractive compared to some of the other targets in the state, due primarily to the shallow target depths of under 1k feet. CEO of FCEN, Patrick Johnson, went on record in February this year, even after January’s lows of around $47/bbl, saying that Falcon Crest could “do very well, even at $50 oil.”

The exceptional project economics at Rocky Ford, where the all-in costs for exploration and development are very low, are exactly the kind of projects the industry is hungry for amid falling spot prices. Johnson is confident that such conventional, non-shale, non-fracking opportunities as the ones available at Rocky Ford present the kind of premium metrics contemporary oil investors are looking for. Regional development has been immense as well, creating a nice logistical backdrop for the company and with daily production in the state having risen by as much as half over the past five years (EIA), all that high-velocity development muscle and capital has to increasingly go somewhere other than the more costly projects with deeper targets.

Falcon Crest is in a good position here to attract larger sector players who are looking to shore up their production budgets during the price downturn cycle and the company could even pull in attention from over-developed plays like the Bakken in North Dakota. There are a small handful of underdeveloped conventional target formations left in the PRB and much of the more recent activity has been focused squarely on the costly tight formations. Stack this reality up against factors like the move by major sector player (and the second largest natural gas producer in the country) late last year, Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK), where they swapped for some key oil production acreage (net acquisition of 66k acres from private E&P company RKI) in the PRB and paid a $450 million bonus on top to seal the deal, and you have a clear testament to the underlying dynamics at play in the PRB. Moreover, CEO of CHK, Doug Lawler made it clear that Chesapeake was bullish about the PRB’s oil potential and sees the basin as a “major oil growth engine for the company.”

The Chesapeake deal didn’t look too hot to some analysts, especially considering the big chunk of cash CHK handed over, but savvy investors will understand what Chesapeake already knows, especially after the company put in a 9.6k foot horizontal well in the Niobrara prior to the RKI deal, expending only 32 days of development time, for a super cheap cost of only $5 million. Namely, drilling costs in the PRB can be extremely attractive and have fallen considerably. This kind of external activity within the state has Falcon Crest excited about their shallow targets and the potential to do conventional oil production from them at low cost.

Investors will want to take a closer look at the company by visiting: www.FalconCrestEnergy.com.

Give us your thoughts! Falcon Crest Energy, Inc. Message Board

Archives

Select A Month
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • Market Basics

    New to the micro-cap markets?Get answers to your questions about investing in Small-Cap / Micro-Cap Stocks and learn how to protect yourself.

    The Basics

    Newsletter Publishers

    Have an up and coming newsletter and want to be included in our coverage list? Looking to get more coverage and grow subscriptions? Register for coverage.

    Register

    Public Companies

    Are you a Small-Cap / Micro-Cap company looking for coverage? We'd love to hear from you. Fill out our quick contact form or send us a text.

    Get Covered