On May 23, 2018, we published revised versions of our Privacy Policy and User Agreements. Please read these updated terms and take some time to understand them. Your use of our services is subject to these revised terms.
Yes, I Agree.

A Strange Tale in Chocolate Land

What could be more innocuous than making candy? You would think that the Hershey Company (NYSE: HSY), with an almost mythic simplicity, its wonderfully personable origins, and an equally redoubtable brand of chocolate, could be an unassailable business. The late Milton Hershey, who founded the company over 100 years ago and built “The Sweetest Place on Earth” – Hershey, Pennsylvania (the all-in-one company town, resort and fantasy place for chocoholics) – might be troubled at how making and selling chocolate confections has become such a troublesome business, with the sweetness mostly gone.

The largest chocolate maker in the U.S., maker of Hershey Bars, Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup, Hershey Kisses and much more, has fallen on difficult times. In 2007, its profits slipped to less than half of the previous year, as its net income was down to $214 million or 93 cents per share, off from its 2006 numbers of $5.59 million net income with EPS at $2.34. Sales in 2007 were $4.9 B, up marginally by only $2.5 million.

The company’s response was to promise a turnaround and let CEO Richard Lenny go, naming David West to take over. The Hershey Foundation, a trust that controls 30% of the stock and most of the voting rights, has been regarded as meddlesome and out of touch with the current business realities, not just by investment observers, but by many Hershey shareholders as well. How could such a wonderful, seemingly foolproof business get this way?

Hershey’s troubles appear to lie at the doorstep of its overly-narrow focus. It is candy and chocolates, and that’s it. Hershey’s competitors, such as Nestle SA (NQB: NSRGY) – the Swiss company which is now the largest food company in the world – rejected narrow focus and instead went for a bold strategy of widely expanding its food and beverage lines. Nestle now has a vast reach deep into many food categories, which is far from the solely candy company that it once was. Privately owned Mars is also a formidable competitor. Kraft (NYSE: KFT), with its line of sweet, chocolate foods like Oreos, is another diversified food company. England’s Cadbury Schweppes (NYSE: CSG) has extensive candies yet is also heavily into the beverage business. Other candy and confection makers are often smaller or premium, high-end companies, and they, too, are taking part of Hershey’s market share away.

Its critics maintain Hershey has only stamped its brand on candies that aren’t really new or unique or exciting, and simply expected these products to sell rather than concentrating on new product development. Even with a $6.5 billion market cap and a renowned brand name in an ever-growing competitive candy-selling climate, more of a responsive strategy is needed. Add to this the fact that the raw material, cacao (from which chocolate is made) has soared in price along with dairy price increases for the sweet milk chocolate makers require, and you have yet another difficulty thrown into the business recipe. Accusations of price fixing also loom. The stock, which has traded between $33 and $56 a share, had fallen to near a five-year low, recently traded in the $37 area.

As early as a year ago, even prior to the economic slowdown, Hershey was experiencing difficulty in a business that should be much more recessionary resistant. 2008 is projected to deliver more of the same poor results, with the promised turnaround not on the horizon. Recently, consensus earnings estimates for 2008 were lowered from approximately $1.85 a share to anywhere in the $1.35-$1.50 range, a downward trend that’s a concern to investors.

Prior to the changeover of CEOs, there had been talk—as there has been for years—that Hershey and Cadbury Schweppes, who have long done some joint ventures, were going to merge, after which Cadbury would sell off its beverage business. This would have created a giant candy conglomerate that would have put Hershey-Cadbury as the dominant–sized player, the largest in the world. Still, the Hershey board seemed to balk at this move – one felt necessary by the investment community to keep Hershey’s prospects growing. More forward-thinking management and some aggressive re-working of its marketing is needed. Of more concern is that Wall Street does not have much confidence in the Hershey trust or board of directors, and without having seen much of anything in the way of turnaround evidence, they aren’t expecting to see anything positive soon.

Let us hear your thoughts below:

Archives

Select A Month
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • Market Basics

    New to the micro-cap markets?Get answers to your questions about investing in Small-Cap / Micro-Cap Stocks and learn how to protect yourself.

    The Basics

    Newsletter Publishers

    Have an up and coming newsletter and want to be included in our coverage list? Looking to get more coverage and grow subscriptions? Register for coverage.

    Register

    Public Companies

    Are you a Small-Cap / Micro-Cap company looking for coverage? We'd love to hear from you. Fill out our quick contact form or send us a text.

    Get Covered