On May 23, 2018, we published revised versions of our Privacy Policy and User Agreements. Please read these updated terms and take some time to understand them. Your use of our services is subject to these revised terms.
Yes, I Agree.

The Ultimate Question of Medical Marijuana

In the U.S., the official legalization of marijuana, at least for medical purposes, can be argued to have begun in 2003, when California became the first state to enact a medical marijuana program, although Oregon was the first state to formally decriminalize cannabis in the mid-1970s when it passed legislation treating the possession of small amounts of the drug as a civil rather than criminal offense. To date, 18 states, plus the District of Columbia, have enacted laws to legalize medical marijuana.

As would be expected, there is a growing queue of companies, including publicly traded companies, lined up to cash in on part of what had long ago established itself as a massive, if underground, industry.

Some of these companies include:

• Growlife, Inc. (OTCQB: PHOT) – maker of LED lighting systems for growing plants indoors
• Medical Marijuana, Inc. (OTC: MJNA) – producer of marijuana plants and associated extract based products
• Cannabis Science, Inc. (OTCQB: CBIS) – producer of phytocannabinoid-based pharmaceutical products
• Hemp, Inc. (OTC: HEMP) – supplier of services, products, and information related to medical marijuana
• Medbox, Inc. (OTC: MDBX) – maker of a securitized prescription vending system for medical personnel

It would seem like an unstoppable freight train, offering astute investors the chance to get in on the ground floor of a very big deal. But is it possible that all of those investments could go up in smoke? Could putting your money in commercial marijuana actually be like investing in the brewing industry in 1919, one year before the passage of Prohibition?

There is, after all, a problem: The federal government still has laws against the possession, growing, or distribution of significant amounts of marijuana, together with a large and powerful agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), responsible for enforcing those laws. Under the government’s Controlled Substances Act (CSA), there is no differentiation between recreational and medical use of marijuana, and there is no recognized difference under the law between marijuana and harder drugs, such as heroin or cocaine. To the federal government, marijuana is not medicine, and no less than the U.S. Supreme Court declared in 2005 that the government has the constitutional authority to prohibit marijuana for all purposes, though stopping short of saying that the given state law was unconstitutional. In fact the states do have a constitutional right to decriminalize conduct which may be declared illegal under federal law. But that doesn’t stop a federal agency from taking action. Given this, the DEA has not ignored the incipient industry, and has taken action against people around the country for the growing or distribution of medical marijuana. The DEA can also arrest individual users. Penalties applied can be severe, and have included extended jail time.

Just how far the DEA will ultimately go with its official mandate is unclear. Although the DEA is given the right to determine what is the best application of its resources, there is certainly no reason to believe that it will ever simply ignore the growing medical marijuana trade. Moreover, the IRS has gotten into the act, applying sections of the U.S. tax code, originally designed to target drug cartels, against medical marijuana dispensaries in what some say is a clear attempt to shut them down. Various other federal agencies have made it clear that they too consider dealing in medical marijuana a violation of the law.

Although movements are in place encouraging the President to thwart attempts at federal interference with state medical marijuana laws, there’s little serious reason to believe that there could ever be an effective two-tiered application of the law, with the federal government enforcing some federal laws while choosing to ignore others. Such a selective disassociation from laws passed by elected representatives of the Congress would not stand for long.

Indeed the real question is whether Congress will ever choose to change its collective mind and back some form of medical marijuana. Independent polls suggest that the majority of Americans are in favor of legalizing marijuana and regulating it like alcohol, though marijuana can be easily grown and such regulation would be far easier said than done. It’s doubtful that the current divisive atmosphere in Congress would encourage much political support for such a potentially inflammatory bill, unless it could be successfully joined with economic measures such as reducing the national debt. And until that happens, medical marijuana, with all its potential size and clout, is still mostly just smoke.

Let us hear your thoughts below:

Archives

Select A Month
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • Market Basics

    New to the micro-cap markets?Get answers to your questions about investing in Small-Cap / Micro-Cap Stocks and learn how to protect yourself.

    The Basics

    Newsletter Publishers

    Have an up and coming newsletter and want to be included in our coverage list? Looking to get more coverage and grow subscriptions? Register for coverage.

    Register

    Public Companies

    Are you a Small-Cap / Micro-Cap company looking for coverage? We'd love to hear from you. Fill out our quick contact form or send us a text.

    Get Covered